|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
Plaintiff and demand |
Court |
Verdict |
|
Hamakyorex (Hamamatsu City) |
Male contract employees demand equal wages |
Otsu Regional Court Hikone Branch |
Company was ordered to pay a ,000 monthly allowance. |
|
Osaka District Court |
Company was ordered to pay a ?0,000 allowance (July 2016) |
||
|
Supreme Court |
Under appeal |
||
|
Nagasawa Transport (Yokohama City) |
Following scheduled retirement, three re-hired male employees protest their wage reduction as "irrational" |
Tokyo District Court |
Ordered the former pay restored with back pay (May 2016) |
|
Tokyo Supreme Court |
Overturned the District Court to rule for the employer (November 2016) |
||
|
Supreme Court |
Under appeal |
||
|
Metro Commerce (Tokyo) |
4 female contract employees allege that wage differentials are illegal |
Tokyo District Court |
Most demands are rejected (March 2017) |
|
Tokyo Supreme Court |
Under appeal |
||
|
Japan Post (Eastern Japan) |
3 male contract employees allege that differences in allowances and holidays are illegal |
Tokyo District Court |
Company was ordered to pay workers amounts from ,000 to (0,000 (September 2017) |
|
Tokyo Supreme Court |
Under appeal |
||
|
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University (Takatsuki City, Osaka Prefecture) |
Full-time arbaito (part-time) employee alleges that wage differentials are illegal |
Osaka District Court |
Verdict to be announced January 24, 2018 |
|
Japan Post (Western Japan) |
8 male contract employees allege that inequalities in allowances and leave time are illegal |
Osaka District Court |
Verdict to be announced February 21, 2018 |